What you receive
- Assay and sample-metadata review
- Quality control and contamination assessment plan
- Taxonomic profiling or assembly strategy
- Diversity analysis appropriate to design
- Reproducible workflow and interpretation notes
Payment is due after delivery of the agreed analysis.
Amplicon profiling and shotgun metagenomics answer different questions. We first review assay type, controls, metadata and reference coverage.
Describe your assay, inputs and study design. Supported methods, tools and delivery capacity are confirmed during review; the items below are possible scope elements, not a commitment to accept every dataset.
A focused review, complete analytical workflow and custom computational project have different requirements. Sample count, assay, reference quality, compute, urgency and interpretation affect the scope. Request an itemized quote; prices and timelines are agreed after assessment.
Analysis cannot guarantee publication, statistical significance or biological validation.
The MD_Metagenome repository provides source-level context. Published files are not a claim of a client’s endorsement or permission for reuse. See our methods and project index for evidence and limitations.
Yes. Choose your current stage and describe the study question. Feasibility and planning can be scoped separately.
No. Do not send confidential or participant data through the inquiry form. Any transfer is agreed through an appropriate secure route.
Data quality and scale, study design, reference resources, compute, deliverables and revisions. We confirm an agreed scope rather than promising a fixed deadline from a short form.
Taxonomic resolution depends on assay and references. Relative abundance is not an absolute cell count. Contamination can dominate low-biomass samples; missing controls constrain interpretation. Functional inference and direct measurement are distinct.
You pay only after you receive the agreed analysis. Deliverables and pricing are agreed before work begins.